saro28
12-19 09:41 AM
Gurus,
Need your help. Can I ask my employer to file a new perm labor processing while I am on EAD status (pending my existing case)?
Idea is to do EB3- EB2 porting with a perm. I heard you can file Perm only if you are on H1 or other status and not on EAD (AOS Pending I485).
Need your help. Can I ask my employer to file a new perm labor processing while I am on EAD status (pending my existing case)?
Idea is to do EB3- EB2 porting with a perm. I heard you can file Perm only if you are on H1 or other status and not on EAD (AOS Pending I485).
wallpaper teased emo hair.
thomasstuart
11-22 06:10 AM
Hi there,
I haven't got any ideas, but I was wondering if you ever got a solution
as I would like to do the same thing. Cheers!
I haven't got any ideas, but I was wondering if you ever got a solution
as I would like to do the same thing. Cheers!
gchopes
10-02 10:51 AM
Starting a new thread to track receipts / check cashed for packages received and signed by M SALCEDO at TSC.
My info:
Pkg signed by M SALCEDO at TSC on 7/27
No CC or RNs.
EB3 India.
Please let me know if you are in a similar boat.
gchopes
My info:
Pkg signed by M SALCEDO at TSC on 7/27
No CC or RNs.
EB3 India.
Please let me know if you are in a similar boat.
gchopes
2011 Then tease hair behind that
green2007
09-25 03:38 PM
I just wandering, how long would it takes get decision in I 485 after FP (background check Cleared)?
I just not make sense to me, that a lot of people file on May and June () are getting approval on September 17, 2007, but latest processing time in NSC for I 485 is December 21, 2006. If that case, my I 485 was filed on July 2, 2007, and it will got approve by the end of this year.
Can someone explain to me how this work or how USCIS make a decision for I 485?
RD: July 2,2007
ND: September 8, 2007
FP: October 11, 2007.
Thanks:p
I just not make sense to me, that a lot of people file on May and June () are getting approval on September 17, 2007, but latest processing time in NSC for I 485 is December 21, 2006. If that case, my I 485 was filed on July 2, 2007, and it will got approve by the end of this year.
Can someone explain to me how this work or how USCIS make a decision for I 485?
RD: July 2,2007
ND: September 8, 2007
FP: October 11, 2007.
Thanks:p
more...
The7zen
12-08 02:46 PM
does it cause any problem when i reentry? NO
Does immigration give new I94 when we enter with AP? YES
if you do a quick search here on the forum you will find more information regarding your questions. Good luck.
-7z
Does immigration give new I94 when we enter with AP? YES
if you do a quick search here on the forum you will find more information regarding your questions. Good luck.
-7z
Macaca
07-29 06:03 PM
Bet on India (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/28/AR2007072800999.html) The Bush administration presses forward with a nuclear agreement -- and hopes for a strategic partnership. July 29, 2007
IN LARGE PART, modern U.S. nuclear nonproliferation policy began with India. India received U.S. aid under the "Atoms for Peace" program of the early Cold War era -- only to lose its U.S. fuel supply because India, which had refused to sign the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), exploded a nuclear "device" in 1974. Decades of U.S. noncooperation with India's civilian atomic energy program were intended to teach India, and the world, a lesson: You will not prosper if you go nuclear outside the system of international safeguards.
Friday marked another step toward the end of that policy -- also with India. The Bush administration and New Delhi announced the principles by which the United States will resume sales of civilian nuclear fuel and technology to India, as promised by President Bush in July 2005. The fine print of the agreement, which must still be approved by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group and by Congress, has not yet been released. But the big picture is clear: The administration is betting that the benefits to the United States and the world of a "strategic partnership" with India outweigh the risks of a giant exception to the old rules of the nonproliferation game.
There are good reasons to make the bet. India is a booming democracy of more than 1 billion people, clearly destined to play a growing role on the world stage. It can help the United States as a trading partner and as a strategic counterweight to China and Islamic extremists. If India uses more nuclear energy, it will emit less greenhouse gas. Perhaps most important, India has developed its own nuclear arsenal without selling materials or know-how to other potentially dangerous states. This is more than can be said for Pakistan, home of the notorious A.Q. Khan nuclear network.
You can call this a double standard, as some of the agreement's critics do: one set of rules for countries we like, another for those we don't. Or you can call it realism: The agreement provides for more international supervision of India's nuclear fuel cycle than there would be without it. For example, it allows India to reprocess atomic fuel but at a new facility under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, to protect against its diversion into weapons. The case for admitting India to the nuclear club is based on the plausible notion that the political character of a nuclear-armed state can be as important, or more important, than its signature on the NPT. North Korea, a Stalinist dictatorship, went nuclear while a member of the NPT; the Islamic Republic of Iran appears headed down the same road. Yet India's democratic system and its manifest interest in joining the global free-market economy suggest that it will behave responsibly.
Or so it must be hoped. The few details of the agreement released Friday suggest that it is very favorable to India indeed, while skating close to the edge of U.S. law. For example, the United States committed to helping India accumulate a nuclear fuel stockpile, thus insulating New Delhi against the threat, provided for by U.S. law, of a supply cutoff in the unlikely event that India resumes weapons testing. Congress is also asking appropriate questions about India's military-to-military contacts with Iran and about New Delhi's stubborn habit of attending meetings of "non-aligned" countries at which Cuba, Venezuela and others bash the United States. As Congress considers this deal, India might well focus on what it can do to show that it, too, thinks of the new strategic partnership with Washington as a two-way street.
IN LARGE PART, modern U.S. nuclear nonproliferation policy began with India. India received U.S. aid under the "Atoms for Peace" program of the early Cold War era -- only to lose its U.S. fuel supply because India, which had refused to sign the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), exploded a nuclear "device" in 1974. Decades of U.S. noncooperation with India's civilian atomic energy program were intended to teach India, and the world, a lesson: You will not prosper if you go nuclear outside the system of international safeguards.
Friday marked another step toward the end of that policy -- also with India. The Bush administration and New Delhi announced the principles by which the United States will resume sales of civilian nuclear fuel and technology to India, as promised by President Bush in July 2005. The fine print of the agreement, which must still be approved by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group and by Congress, has not yet been released. But the big picture is clear: The administration is betting that the benefits to the United States and the world of a "strategic partnership" with India outweigh the risks of a giant exception to the old rules of the nonproliferation game.
There are good reasons to make the bet. India is a booming democracy of more than 1 billion people, clearly destined to play a growing role on the world stage. It can help the United States as a trading partner and as a strategic counterweight to China and Islamic extremists. If India uses more nuclear energy, it will emit less greenhouse gas. Perhaps most important, India has developed its own nuclear arsenal without selling materials or know-how to other potentially dangerous states. This is more than can be said for Pakistan, home of the notorious A.Q. Khan nuclear network.
You can call this a double standard, as some of the agreement's critics do: one set of rules for countries we like, another for those we don't. Or you can call it realism: The agreement provides for more international supervision of India's nuclear fuel cycle than there would be without it. For example, it allows India to reprocess atomic fuel but at a new facility under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, to protect against its diversion into weapons. The case for admitting India to the nuclear club is based on the plausible notion that the political character of a nuclear-armed state can be as important, or more important, than its signature on the NPT. North Korea, a Stalinist dictatorship, went nuclear while a member of the NPT; the Islamic Republic of Iran appears headed down the same road. Yet India's democratic system and its manifest interest in joining the global free-market economy suggest that it will behave responsibly.
Or so it must be hoped. The few details of the agreement released Friday suggest that it is very favorable to India indeed, while skating close to the edge of U.S. law. For example, the United States committed to helping India accumulate a nuclear fuel stockpile, thus insulating New Delhi against the threat, provided for by U.S. law, of a supply cutoff in the unlikely event that India resumes weapons testing. Congress is also asking appropriate questions about India's military-to-military contacts with Iran and about New Delhi's stubborn habit of attending meetings of "non-aligned" countries at which Cuba, Venezuela and others bash the United States. As Congress considers this deal, India might well focus on what it can do to show that it, too, thinks of the new strategic partnership with Washington as a two-way street.
more...
caydee
07-14 08:35 PM
Did IV collect names Tel # of the participants of this rally?
Yes, during registration. All participants were asked to register before the rally........
Yes, during registration. All participants were asked to register before the rally........
2010 Tease hairstyle was chosen by
h_shaik
10-17 12:44 PM
Bump
more...
Roger Binny
11-17 03:22 PM
Pranav Mistry: The thrilling potential of SixthSense technology | Video on TED.com (http://www.ted.com/talks/pranav_mistry_the_thrilling_potential_of_sixthsens e_technology.html)
When ever some one asks about tell the great innovation from India, and other curious things first search top 50 univs, faculty, phd's or TED kind of forums and other places or ask them to do so.
As well we can tell them that probably we may not arrived yet to launch a life changing product,the moment we arrive there, WE promise that we may never talk about immigration specially EB-reforms.
Yes, with out a backup up of big institutions(this case MIT) this dream or idea would have just lived like any wish or it would have taken 3 or 4 times longer.
PS: Not sure about pranav's immigration status.
When ever some one asks about tell the great innovation from India, and other curious things first search top 50 univs, faculty, phd's or TED kind of forums and other places or ask them to do so.
As well we can tell them that probably we may not arrived yet to launch a life changing product,the moment we arrive there, WE promise that we may never talk about immigration specially EB-reforms.
Yes, with out a backup up of big institutions(this case MIT) this dream or idea would have just lived like any wish or it would have taken 3 or 4 times longer.
PS: Not sure about pranav's immigration status.
hair girl with teased hair
ravi98
09-28 09:42 AM
Ten Economic Facts about Immigration - Brookings Institution (http://www.brookings.edu/reports/2010/09_immigration_greenstone_looney.aspx)
A major economic concern is how immigrants influence the wages and employment prospects of U.S. workers. The economic impacts of immigration vary tremendously, depending on whether immigrants are unskilled agricultural laborers, for example, or highly skilled PhD computer scientists. Although their consequences are often conflated, it is constructive to examine the impacts of low-skilled and high-skilled immigrants independently.
Is it possible for the administration to do a study on this matter through a commission - and take its recommendations to formulate the laws accordingly - and immediately? This takes away the usual BS that politicians from both side dish us?
A major economic concern is how immigrants influence the wages and employment prospects of U.S. workers. The economic impacts of immigration vary tremendously, depending on whether immigrants are unskilled agricultural laborers, for example, or highly skilled PhD computer scientists. Although their consequences are often conflated, it is constructive to examine the impacts of low-skilled and high-skilled immigrants independently.
Is it possible for the administration to do a study on this matter through a commission - and take its recommendations to formulate the laws accordingly - and immediately? This takes away the usual BS that politicians from both side dish us?
more...
kisana
11-03 07:41 AM
I request one of you guys please advice.
hot Big gothic hairstyles since
yabadaba
06-21 10:25 AM
thats means its not approved. u cant file for i140 without labor approval..hence cannot file 485 also.
sorry for the bad news
sorry for the bad news
more...
house karolina kurkova hairstyles
anilsal
03-03 03:01 AM
Work at IL State Chapter is going on. Mainly visit the lawmaker(s) via their staff / case workers on immigration.
For anyone interested in the IL State Chapter, you will have to PM me.
For anyone interested in the IL State Chapter, you will have to PM me.
tattoo Bouffant s tease hairstyle
surabhi
07-23 09:59 AM
Hi,
Apologize for starting new thread, but this is an urgent request and need attention.
I need to respond to a RFE related to proving Programmer Analyst being a Speciaity occupation.
I researched and found a memo from Terrance Way, Director INS issued a memo on this on December 22, 2000 and is available on AILA Infonet
AILA InfoNet at Doc. No. 01040603
I couldnt locate this memo in USCIS policy guidance memoranda search.
Can some one with access to AILA Infonet, please send me this document
Thanks in advance
Regards
Apologize for starting new thread, but this is an urgent request and need attention.
I need to respond to a RFE related to proving Programmer Analyst being a Speciaity occupation.
I researched and found a memo from Terrance Way, Director INS issued a memo on this on December 22, 2000 and is available on AILA Infonet
AILA InfoNet at Doc. No. 01040603
I couldnt locate this memo in USCIS policy guidance memoranda search.
Can some one with access to AILA Infonet, please send me this document
Thanks in advance
Regards
more...
pictures teased emo hair. teased emo
iamcutewithu
01-03 02:22 AM
Hi,
I have been working with a company ABC from April 2007 in India. In Oct 2007 I got my H1B visa stamped for a company XYZ of USA and is valid thru OCT 2010. I took a long vacation here in India and went to USA for the company XYZ and stayed there for 45 days. During the period of stay I got my SSN and also I got one payslip generated for two weeks. Becoz of the market slowdown I had to return back to India and joined the same company ABC in India. Now this company ABC wants to process B1 for me, So is there any problem if I have to apply for B1 and is there any problem in the Embassy about the 45 days I spent in US on H1B while I was employed in a company ABC from April 2007?
Please suggest me on this asap
I have been working with a company ABC from April 2007 in India. In Oct 2007 I got my H1B visa stamped for a company XYZ of USA and is valid thru OCT 2010. I took a long vacation here in India and went to USA for the company XYZ and stayed there for 45 days. During the period of stay I got my SSN and also I got one payslip generated for two weeks. Becoz of the market slowdown I had to return back to India and joined the same company ABC in India. Now this company ABC wants to process B1 for me, So is there any problem if I have to apply for B1 and is there any problem in the Embassy about the 45 days I spent in US on H1B while I was employed in a company ABC from April 2007?
Please suggest me on this asap
dresses ponytail with teased crown
go_gc_way
10-02 04:40 PM
Hello Friends,
Now the Fence bill has come and gone, none of our amendments are included in, all by now may have realized we need to keep it up for few more months before we see something happen.
And all those waiting for something to happen may also have realized that they need to contribute $, and I believe they did. (I did.)
I sincerely believe that IV members need also have to do one more SIMPLE ACT. Please spread the word about IV.
I have seen N number of times IV core members & many others, requesting to post the banner of IV in the grocery store you visit to help admit more members.
If you have not done it, please do so. I did it.
Simple things like this will help IV membership grow bigger and better chances of getting something done.
Thanks
(I am not a member of IV Core Team)
Now the Fence bill has come and gone, none of our amendments are included in, all by now may have realized we need to keep it up for few more months before we see something happen.
And all those waiting for something to happen may also have realized that they need to contribute $, and I believe they did. (I did.)
I sincerely believe that IV members need also have to do one more SIMPLE ACT. Please spread the word about IV.
I have seen N number of times IV core members & many others, requesting to post the banner of IV in the grocery store you visit to help admit more members.
If you have not done it, please do so. I did it.
Simple things like this will help IV membership grow bigger and better chances of getting something done.
Thanks
(I am not a member of IV Core Team)
more...
makeup The hairstyle really opens up
tempworker_tn_1
03-24 12:22 PM
waiting further direction.
girlfriend 2011 popular hairstyle trends-
Blog Feeds
08-06 08:20 PM
Supporters of stricter border enforcement must have uncorked the champagne yesterday. The Senate, in bipartisan fashion, broke a deadlock over funding and passed S. 3721, a $600 million emergency appropriation that would bring 1,500 more federal enforcers and unmanned aerial drones to the U.S. border. Last week, the requisite number of House members voted "yea" to a similar bill with a $701 million price tag. Some form of enhanced border security legislation is likely to reach the President's desk soon. The Senate's border funding tussle involved a face-off between Republicans (who wanted to pay for the bill by diverting money...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/08/my-entry.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/08/my-entry.html)
hairstyles spiral curls hairstyle the
ashkam
03-03 04:11 PM
I am a July' 07 I-485 filer and have received my EAD and AP.
I am currently on H1 and not using my EAD yet.
In my situation can I accept any contract work on 1099? This will be beside my full time work.
Do I have to switch to EAD from H1 to accept 1099 for contract work?
Thanks in advance.
I believe you have to switch to an EAD if you want to engage in some work on the side.
I am currently on H1 and not using my EAD yet.
In my situation can I accept any contract work on 1099? This will be beside my full time work.
Do I have to switch to EAD from H1 to accept 1099 for contract work?
Thanks in advance.
I believe you have to switch to an EAD if you want to engage in some work on the side.
Blog Feeds
07-02 04:30 PM
The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced today that it served Notices of Inspection upon 652 businesses around the country. Compare this with the 508 businesses which received Notices of Inspection in fiscal year 2008. An ICE spokesman told the press: "Part of the strategy is to show businesses that we mean business." We link to the ICE press release and the news story from our "Employers' Immigration Guide" at http://shusterman.com/toc-emp.html#9 Notices of Inspection are served on employers to compel them to surrender their I-9 forms to the government. The I-9 form verifies the identity and the employment authorization...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/07/employers-caught-up-in-a-catch22.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/07/employers-caught-up-in-a-catch22.html)
optimist578
01-17 04:36 PM
Can labor and I140 be filed from an employer, even if employee is not working for that employer currently, may be with the intention of joining that employer at later date? Please reply.
How about 485?
thanks.
Yes. GC processing is for a future job. So, labor and I-140 can certainly be filed without being on the payroll. I think I-485 also can be filed before joining the firm. But you should confirm this part from a lawyer.
How about 485?
thanks.
Yes. GC processing is for a future job. So, labor and I-140 can certainly be filed without being on the payroll. I think I-485 also can be filed before joining the firm. But you should confirm this part from a lawyer.
No comments:
Post a Comment